Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Towards a useable git-branch
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 24, 2013, 18:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0=QbDAmbRm+01FWc3Okhcgg8RdoRjwfkjrsZ8n=Zm007g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vobc09sf6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Yes, the aim of the topic should be to make the machinery flexible > enough so that we can lose -v/-vv implementation and replace them > with calls to the new machinery with canned set of output format > templates.
Definitely. I don't want to keep my ugly alias around forever, and I certainly want more users to have easy access to this (configurable git-branch output formats). However, the series is not the theoretical exercise of prettifying the code underlying -v and -vv. Supporting -v and -vv is something we _have_ to do to preserve backward compatibility, and I would consider it a side-effect of the series rather than the "aim of the topic". The aim of the topic is to get more useful output from git-branch.
As long as the topic doesn't paint us into a corner after which it will be impossible to implement -v and -vv on top of the format, I think we're good.