Re: [Resend PATCH] t3903 (stash): add failing test for ref of form ^{/message}
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 16, 2013, 20:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0=JdJGf7+yWvi2xkoruixK5G5mnQXm8pFhK60NQB2qX0Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vmwsyl3mv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I do not think anybody considered the approach to look at the commit > object name and making sure it appears in the reflog that implements > the stash. It sounds like a more robust check if done right.
Actually, if you think about it, there is really only one way to specify revisions in the stash's reflog: stash@*. Since these commits don't have to be reachable from any refs in the general case, all the other revision syntaxes are useless. So, I would argue that "${REV%@*}" is sufficient and correct*: anything beyond it is an unnecessary overhead.
However, the initial bug is still valid: show should not show something that pop cannot operate on.
* although I'd have been more comfortable if we had a neater way to specify that