Re: [PATCH 00/20] ref transactions part 2
- From
Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
- Date
- Jul 16, 2014, 22:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAL=YDWnQpLxM1TJ3dja+hGGNd1ckFUJHz83Z=WsOcfo24PT0Vg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqegxlq799.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
I had a look at the changes in origin/pu and they look sane to me.
make test passes all tests too.
regards ronnie sahlberg
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com> writes: > >> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com> wrote: >>> This is the next 20 patches from my originally big patch series and follow >>> the previous 19 patches that is now in juns tree. >>> These patches were numbered 20-39 in the original 48-patch series. >>> >>> Changes since these patches were in the original series: >>> >>> - Addressing concerns from mhagger's review > > One patch in the series did not apply cleanly on top of the tip of > the previous series (now queued as rs/ref-transaction-0) and I had > to wiggle it. Please check the result (queued as three topics, this > one is rs/ref-transaction-1 which is built on the abovementioned > "-0", and the remainder from the previous round is rebased on "-1" > as rs/ref-transaction), all of which are queued on 'jch' (which is > part of 'pu'). > > Thanks.