From: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:26:47 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] receive-pack.c: add a receive.preferatomicpush configuration variable
Message-ID: <CAL=YDWms5geok1j8tQUjHaOVTSG-_zbTob_AVX0GS8cA0rwaSQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy4rxtdu5.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com> writes:
>
>> At some stage it may becomes too many preferences and over-engineered.
>> Maybe I should drop this patch and then just require the plain "if you
>> want a push to be atomic, then use --atomic-push. end." and we have
>> simple and easy to understand semantics.
>
> As I still do not quite understand why you find that this could be a
> "convenience preference" on the server operator's end, that would be
> my preference, at least until I am convinced why this could be a
> good idea.
>
> Thanks.
>

Ok,  I dropped this patch.

Thanks
Ronnie Sahlberg