Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2025, #03)

>
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2025, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 10:59:56AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, 12 Dec 2025, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> >> >> * ar/run-command-hook (2025-12-04) 11 commits
> >> >> ...
> >> >>  Use hook API to replace ad-hoc invocation of hook scripts with the
> >> >>  run_command() API.
> >> >>
> >> >>  Will merge to 'next'?
> >> >>  source: <20251204141535.1986263-1-adrian.ratiu@collabora.com>
> >> >
> >> > I think this can be merged to next, since the latest iteration has been
> >> > sitting for a few weeks with no more feedback and all tests are green.
> >>
> >> "tests being green" tells us that with the current coverage we
> >> didn't see any regression but not more than that.  Especially, it
> >> does not say anything about the quality of new code (and test) and
> >> if it is in good shape to build on top.
> >>
> >> It also is very hard to tell from "no more feedback" if there is no
> >> room for further improvements, or people are simply disinterested in
> >> the topic and are not tempted to spend their brain cycles to help
> >> improve the topic.
> >>
> >> If there is no more comments, I'll try to see if I can block some
> >> time to read the topic over myself with a pair of fresh eyes before
> >> deciding.
> >
> > Thanks for the ping, I've now did another pass through v4 of this patch
> > series. It looked mostly good except for one question I had. Depending
> > on the answer I think this should be ready to go.
>
> I'll give Junio some more days in case he wants to take a look again at
> the series, then send one last re-roll fixing your nits/question and
> also addressing Junio's feedback, if there is any.