Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2025, #03)
- From
Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com>
- Date
- Dec 16, 2025, 10:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87v7i6g13j.fsf@collabora.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <aUEUrXFaAfgzSs12@pks.im>
On Tue, 16 Dec 2025, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
Show 32 quoted lines
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 10:59:56AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com> writes: >> >> > On Fri, 12 Dec 2025, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> * ar/run-command-hook (2025-12-04) 11 commits >> >> ... >> >> Use hook API to replace ad-hoc invocation of hook scripts with the >> >> run_command() API. >> >> >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> >> source: <20251204141535.1986263-1-adrian.ratiu@collabora.com> >> > >> > I think this can be merged to next, since the latest iteration has been >> > sitting for a few weeks with no more feedback and all tests are green. >> >> "tests being green" tells us that with the current coverage we >> didn't see any regression but not more than that. Especially, it >> does not say anything about the quality of new code (and test) and >> if it is in good shape to build on top. >> >> It also is very hard to tell from "no more feedback" if there is no >> room for further improvements, or people are simply disinterested in >> the topic and are not tempted to spend their brain cycles to help >> improve the topic. >> >> If there is no more comments, I'll try to see if I can block some >> time to read the topic over myself with a pair of fresh eyes before >> deciding. > > Thanks for the ping, I've now did another pass through v4 of this patch > series. It looked mostly good except for one question I had. Depending > on the answer I think this should be ready to go.
I'll give Junio some more days in case he wants to take a look again at the series, then send one last re-roll fixing your nits/question and also addressing Junio's feedback, if there is any.
Thanks!