On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:05:34AM -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote:
>> It would probably be better to have progress.c check isatty(2) all the time,
>> but that wouldn't allow things like 'git push --progress' to force progress
>> reporting to on, so I won't try to solve the general case right now.
>
> This looks better. There is a slight inaccuracy in your subject line,
> though. We are not defaulting to quiet if !isatty(2) in all cases, but
> rather only when we call into unpack_trees, which generates the progress
> output. We will still print the ahead/behind line, detached HEAD info,
> etc.
>
> Which I think is the right behavior, but is not quite what is advertised
> by your commit message.
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>