Re: [PATCH 0/5] Use watchman to reduce index refresh time
- From
- Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 3, 2015, 10:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAHVLzcnm6qUhcuuP36Q7Yvf9rUAu-KK4j5-Rzmzd_CFCaRwYug@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8Dz17gRSHch9e=iB2Kq2t4FbssatW84DF8pHTuFMgEgjQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 25 quoted lines
>> It was from last year. I may have measured it but because I didn't >> save it in the commit message, it was lost anyway. Installing watchman >> and measuring with webkit.git soon.. > > Test repo: webkit.git with 104665 tracked files, 5615 untracked, > 3517 dirs. Best numbers out of a few tries. This is best case > scenario. Normal usage could have worse numbers. > > There is something strange about the "-uno" measurements. I don't > think watchman+untracked cache can beat -uno.. Maybe I did something > wrong. > > 0m0.383s index v2 > 0m0.351s index v4 > 0m0.352s v2 split-index > 0m0.309s v2 split index-helper > 0m0.159s v2 split helper untracked-cache > 0m0.123s v2 split helper "status -uno" > 0m0.098s v2 split helper untracked watchman > 0m0.071s v2 split helper watchman "status -uno" > > Note, the watchman series needs > s/free_watchman_shm/release_watchman_shm/ (I didn't do a good job > of testing after rebase). And there's a small bug in index-helper > --detach code writing incorrect PID..
Impressive improvements!
Ciao, Paolo
-- Paolo