Re: [GSoC] Update: Week 5
- From
Andrew Ardill <andrew.ardill@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 20, 2017, 00:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAH5451n4XDdeAz4T7aAsaSC00hnZ53Gb7j0CSiTg4QLUZKvxXw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAME+mvUQJFneV7b1G7zmAidP-5L=nimvY43V0ug-Gtesr83tzg@mail.gmail.com>
On 20 June 2017 at 07:41, Prathamesh Chavan <pc44800@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> But as communicating between child_process is still an issue > and so there was no simple was to current carry out the > porting. And hence, a hack was used instead. But after > discussing it, instead using the repository-object patch > series will help to resolve these issues in this situation.
Just wondering, does that mean that your patch series is dependent on the repository-object one? I saw some discussion around it recently but couldn't see it in the latest whats cooking so maybe I missed what has happened to it.
Really enjoying your updates, by the way, they are very clear and show what looks like great progress!
Regards,
Andrew Ardill