git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: git submodules implementation question

From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Date
Sep 1, 2016, 21:04 UTC
Message-ID
<CAGZ79kaVBX_zLsSwkz=d_JUfvkeYHyZ1kkYm7Ae_dGBfFarDCQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<xmqq4m5zwevl.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 31 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
>>
>>>> The final version needs to be accompanied with tests to show the
>>>> effect of this change for callers.  A test would set up a top-level
>>>> and submodule, deliberately break submodule/.git/ repository and
>>>> show what breaks and how without this change.
>>>
>>> Tests are really good at providing this context as well, or to communicate
>>> the actual underlying problem, which is not quite clear to me.
>>> That is why I refrained from jumping into the discussion as I think the
>>> first few emails were dropped from the mailing list and I am missing context.
>>
>> I do not know where you started reading, but the gist of it is that
>> submodule.c spawns subprocess to run in the submodule's context by
>> assuming that chdir'ing into the <path> of the submodule and running
>> it (i.e. cp.dir set to <path> to drive start_command(&cp)) is
>> sufficient.  When <path>/.git (either it is a directory itself or it
>> points at a directory in .git/module/<name> in the superproject) is
>> a corrupt repository, running "git -C <path> command" would try to
>> auto-detect the repository, because it thinks <path>/.git is not a
>> repository and it thinks it is not at the top-level of the working
>> tree, and instead finds the repository of the top-level, which is
>> almost never what we want.
>
> This is with a test that covers the call in get_next_submodule() for
> the parallel fetch callback.  I think many of the codepaths will end
> up recursing forever the same way without the fix in a submodule
> repository that is broken in a similar way, but I didn't check, so
> I do not consider this to be completed.
Oh I see. That seems like a nasty bug.
Show 24 quoted lines
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: submodule: avoid auto-discovery in prepare_submodule_repo_env()
>
> The function is used to set up the environment variable used in a
> subprocess we spawn in a submodule directory.  The callers set up a
> child_process structure, find the working tree path of one submodule
> and set .dir field to it, and then use start_command() API to spawn
> the subprocess like "status", "fetch", etc.
>
> When this happens, we expect that the ".git" (either a directory or
> a gitfile that points at the real location) in the current working
> directory of the subprocess MUST be the repository for the submodule.
>
> If this ".git" thing is a corrupt repository, however, because
> prepare_submodule_repo_env() unsets GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE, the
> subprocess will see ".git", thinks it is not a repository, and
> attempt to find one by going up, likely to end up in finding the
> repository of the superproject.  In some codepaths, this will cause
> a command run with the "--recurse-submodules" option to recurse
> forever.
>
> By exporting GIT_DIR=.git, disable the auto-discovery logic in the
> subprocess, which would instead stop it and report an error.

and GIT_DIR=.git works for both .git files as well as the old fashioned way, with the submodule repository at .git/, although that is not really documented.

Show 35 quoted lines
>
> Not-signed-off-yet.
> ---
>  submodule.c                 |  1 +
>  t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
> index 1b5cdfb..e8258f0 100644
> --- a/submodule.c
> +++ b/submodule.c
> @@ -1160,4 +1160,5 @@ void prepare_submodule_repo_env(struct argv_array *out)
>                 if (strcmp(*var, CONFIG_DATA_ENVIRONMENT))
>                         argv_array_push(out, *var);
>         }
> +       argv_array_push(out, "GIT_DIR=.git");
>  }
> diff --git a/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh b/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh
> index 954d0e4..b2dee30 100755
> --- a/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh
> +++ b/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh
> @@ -485,4 +485,33 @@ test_expect_success 'fetching submodules respects parallel settings' '
>         )
>  '
>
> +test_expect_success 'fetching submodule into a broken repository' '
> +       # Prepare src and src/sub nested in it
> +       git init src &&
> +       (
> +               cd src &&
> +               git init sub &&
> +               git -C sub commit --allow-empty -m "initial in sub" &&
> +               git submodule add -- ./sub sub &&
> +               git commit -m "initial in top"
> +       ) &&
This is not needed, as setup() set up some repositories for you.
> +
> +       # Clone the old-fashoned way
> +       git clone src dst &&
if you don't go with your own setup, maybe:
        git clone . dst
        git -C dst clone ../submodule submodule
    # and further down s/sub/submodule/
> +       git -C dst clone ../src/sub sub &&
> +
> +       # Make sure that old-fashoned layout is still supported
fashioned
Show 11 quoted lines
> +       git -C dst status &&
> +
> +       # Recursive-fetch works fine
> +       git -C dst fetch --recurse-submodules &&
> +
> +       # Break the receiving submodule
> +       rm -f dst/sub/.git/HEAD &&
> +
> +       # Recursive-fetch must terminate
> +       # NOTE: without fix this will recurse forever!
> +       test_must_fail git -C dst fetch --recurse-submodules

So in case we'd break it again in the future we'd notice by an infinite time for the test suite, then we'd notice this comment and know what's going on?

I would have suggested to run this actual test in a subshell and then check if the expected failure would have recovered after a second or two and depending on that trigger a test failure.

But it doesn't seem to be easy with shells, so this is fine (even the newer signed off patch, apart from nits above)

Show 5 quoted lines
> +'
> +
>  test_done
>
>
Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 28 of 31 in “git submodules implementation question”
  1. Uma SrinivasanAug 28, 2016
  2. Junio C HamanoAug 29, 2016
  3. Uma SrinivasanAug 29, 2016
  4. Junio C HamanoAug 29, 2016
  5. Uma SrinivasanAug 29, 2016
  6. Uma SrinivasanAug 29, 2016
  7. Junio C HamanoAug 29, 2016
  8. Uma SrinivasanAug 29, 2016
  9. Jacob KellerAug 30, 2016
  10. Uma SrinivasanAug 30, 2016
  11. Jacob KellerAug 30, 2016
  12. Jacob KellerAug 30, 2016
  13. Uma SrinivasanAug 30, 2016
  14. Junio C HamanoAug 30, 2016
  15. Uma SrinivasanAug 31, 2016
  16. Junio C HamanoAug 31, 2016
  17. Uma SrinivasanAug 31, 2016
  18. Junio C HamanoAug 31, 2016
  19. Uma SrinivasanAug 31, 2016
  20. Uma SrinivasanSep 1, 2016
  21. Junio C HamanoSep 1, 2016
  22. Uma SrinivasanSep 1, 2016
  23. Junio C HamanoSep 1, 2016
  24. Stefan BellerSep 1, 2016
  25. Junio C HamanoSep 1, 2016
  26. Junio C HamanoSep 1, 2016
  27. Junio C HamanoSep 1, 2016
  28. Stefan BellerSep 1, 2016
  29. Junio C HamanoSep 1, 2016
  30. Uma SrinivasanSep 1, 2016
  31. Junio C HamanoSep 1, 2016

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.