Re: How safe are signed git tags? Only as safe as SHA-1 or somehow safer?
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Nov 25, 2014, 03:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kZkqVZ+G-J+HKDwmK+W80E_28DyvxKVpEACPXoX88KLAA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8C3Bfruy=usn9MajmLP_10s2zf8AFZJmxyeGSPDS9SwVQ@mail.gmail.com>
That's not *as* painful, because you'd have the beautiful fast-{import/export} tools in your new and old version control system. But yeah, there might be better ways to do so.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think the biggest obstacle is the upgrade path. ;-) > > In the worst case we can always treat new repos as a different VCS. So > people will need a migration from SHA-1 to the new format, just like > they migrate from SVN/CVS to Git. Painful but simple. > -- > Duy > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html