Re: How safe are signed git tags? Only as safe as SHA-1 or somehow safer?
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Nov 25, 2014, 03:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20141125034730.GB19161@peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8C3Bfruy=usn9MajmLP_10s2zf8AFZJmxyeGSPDS9SwVQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:52:58AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think the biggest obstacle is the upgrade path. ;-) > > In the worst case we can always treat new repos as a different VCS. So > people will need a migration from SHA-1 to the new format, just like > they migrate from SVN/CVS to Git. Painful but simple.
Maybe we can fix the tree-sorting order while we are at it. :)
More seriously, there may come a day when we are ready to break compatibility completely with a new "Git v3.0" (2.0 is already taken, of course). I do not have immediate plans for it, but it's possible that multiple factors may make such a move desirable sometime in the next 10 years, and that would be a good time to jump hash algorithms, as well.
So it's possible that procrastinating on SHA-1 issues may be the least painful route. Or it may just be pushing off the day of pain. :)
-Peff