Re: How safe are signed git tags? Only as safe as SHA-1 or somehow safer?
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 24, 2014, 01:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8D-W_YrxMgUDScSmkNBKMVpRu_Kc0k6nsfyhmoLg5HBjg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20141117212657.GC15880@peff.net>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> Yes, it is only as "safe as SHA-1" in the sense that you have GPG-signed > only a SHA-1 hash. If somebody can find a collision with a hash you have > signed, they can substitute the colliding data for the data you signed.
I wonder if we can have an option to sign all blob content of the tree associated to a commit, and the content of parent commit(s). It's more expensive than signing just commit/tag content. But it's also safer without completely ditching SHA-1.
-- Duy