Re: [PATCH 1/3] submodule update: make use of the existing fetch_in_submodule function
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- May 25, 2016, 22:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kZHZPqKGW6MEt1QZa=3wb+6jQC=pZ4uJJq4KN=bFGFoeA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqa8jdzroz.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 24 quoted lines
> Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes: > >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> >> --- >> git-submodule.sh | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/git-submodule.sh b/git-submodule.sh >> index 5a4dec0..7698102 100755 >> --- a/git-submodule.sh >> +++ b/git-submodule.sh >> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ cmd_update() >> if test -z "$nofetch" >> then >> # Fetch remote before determining tracking $sha1 >> - (sanitize_submodule_env; cd "$sm_path" && git-fetch) || >> + fetch_in_submodule "$sm_path" || >> die "$(eval_gettext "Unable to fetch in submodule path '\$sm_path'")" >> fi >> remote_name=$(sanitize_submodule_env; cd "$sm_path" && get_default_remote) > > Makes sense. The main topic does not depend on this change, I hope, > as I think it is OK to queue this separately and have it graduate > before 2.9-rc1.
It doesn't, I should have send this as an independent series/patch.
Thanks, Stefan