Re: [PATCH v3] refs.c: add a function to append a reflog entry to a fd
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Nov 20, 2014, 21:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kZDMWyW46wNgqudPiX1UmZteyFVJXMAYqJpp8e_r8LCmQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20141120212022.GJ6527@google.com>
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
>> >> For now the new function is only used from log_ref_write, but later >> on we will call this function from reflog transactions too. That means >> that we will end up with only a single place, where we write a >> reflog entry to a file instead of the current two places >> (log_ref_write and builtin/reflog.c). > > Line-wrapping width is still inconsistent. I don't think it's worth > resending just for that, but something to look out for in the future. >
ok, I'll care about that more in the future.
Show 5 quoted lines
> I don't understand why the above writes to a temporary variable and > checks it, never to read that temporary again. > > I don't think that alone is a reason to block the patch, but it > worries me in that the review comment seems to have been just lost.
It wasn't lost as I think it should go in a follow up patch. Sorry for not stating that clearly. (This patch is about moving code around, not changing code)
I got interrupted preparing the follow up patch, which gets rid of the temporary variable.