Re: [PATCH 00/11] Allow reference values to be checked in a transaction
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
>
>> I am not sure what advantages this would bring. A better history
>> for bisection? I cannot speak for Michael, but my understanding was
>> to have mh/reflog-expire and sb/atomic-push-fix merged now that 2.3
>> is out and everything else on top is unclear/rerolled/discussed as needed.
>
> Stefan, I think you mean sb/atomic-push, not sb/atomic-push-fix, right?
Of course, sorry for adding more confusion here.