From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:41:19 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Allow reference values to be checked in a transaction
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kZ3ShkW0tu=1uskXw-R93pnkw0faxut-5kA=UrsJiv+Ng@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54D91B24.5050808@alum.mit.edu>

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

>
>> I am not sure what advantages this would bring. A better history
>> for bisection? I cannot speak for Michael, but my understanding was
>> to have mh/reflog-expire and sb/atomic-push-fix merged now that 2.3
>> is out and everything else on top is unclear/rerolled/discussed as needed.
>
> Stefan, I think you mean sb/atomic-push, not sb/atomic-push-fix, right?

Of course, sorry for adding more confusion here.