Re: [PATCH v4 31/44] builtin-am: implement -S/--gpg-sign, commit.gpgsign
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Jul 1, 2015, 16:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kYSWn61HT7K--AcYfJe3r8QZA2GarJPtCnqLP5aoUCWzQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACRoPnQBhCObCaksfpmN9zcDxp676SkxEJqjcaKi1B3JRMeXVw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote: >> I needed to read this patch a few times as this patch introduces `sign_commit` >> twice. This is mostly a review problem I'd guess as in the code it >> just affects this >> method and you'd see all the code of the method easily compared to hunks sent >> via email. But renaming this variable doesn't hurt. > > OK. What variable name do you want? Would "gpgsign" (to match > commit.gpgsign) do?
Fine with me.
Thanks, Stefan