Re: [PATCH 2/2] bisect--helper: `check_expected_revs` shell function in C
- From
Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 10, 2016, 07:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAFZEwPNYxWpFcspHL8Oo3NydUPuKQeZWCFphM_an+_iKk9wBVw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cQVWng0idk0ETRQA44OsS5+GewVX=pt4uOg-=SFbL+deQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hey Eric,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com> wrote: >> Reimplement the `check_expected_revs` shell function in C and add a >> `--check-expected-revs` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it >> from git-bisect.sh . >> [...] >> Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com> >> --- >> diff --git a/builtin/bisect--helper.c b/builtin/bisect--helper.c >> index 06bc9b8..500efd5 100644 >> @@ -174,13 +174,28 @@ static int is_expected_rev(const char *expected_hex) >> +static int check_expected_revs(const char **revs, int no) > > In this codebase, it's more common to name this 'nr' rather than 'no'. > 'revs_nr' would also be a good name.
Thanks. I will use `revs_nr`.
Regards, Pranit Bauva