Re: [RFC] test: Old shells and physical paths
- From
David Michael <fedora.dm0@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 20, 2012, 02:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAEvUa7=_iyXxaaRs3WtxZOy5PNnncG-iMAUNkCMLJ19ZtReqaw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vmwx97f0o.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Is "here is a nickel, get a better shell" an option?
It is, somewhat. There is a pre-built port of GNU bash 2.03 for the platform, but I was trying to see how far things could go with the OS's supported shell before having to bring in unsupported dependencies. Unfortunately, I do not believe the OS fully conforms to POSIX.1-2001 yet, so that means no "-P" or "-L" without going rogue.
I'll carry test fixes for this platform locally.
Thanks.
David