From: David Michael Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 02:28:36 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC] test: Old shells and physical paths Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vmwx97f0o.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Is "here is a nickel, get a better shell" an option? It is, somewhat. There is a pre-built port of GNU bash 2.03 for the platform, but I was trying to see how far things could go with the OS's supported shell before having to bring in unsupported dependencies. Unfortunately, I do not believe the OS fully conforms to POSIX.1-2001 yet, so that means no "-P" or "-L" without going rogue. I'll carry test fixes for this platform locally. Thanks. David