Re: [RFC] test: Old shells and physical paths
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 20, 2012, 00:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vmwx97f0o.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAEvUa7=sOPF9xwfGuBXv0CBZhT+79+8z3tm9ar_cz3q--kfqRQ@mail.gmail.com>
David Michael <fedora.dm0@gmail.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> In working on a port, I have to tolerate an ancient shell. The "cd" > and "pwd" commands don't understand the "-P" flag for physical paths, > as some tests use. The biggest offender is "cd -P" causing a failure > in t/test-lib.sh (since 1bd9c64), which is sourced by every test > script.
Is "here is a nickel, get a better shell" an option? Running tests is one thing, but I'd be worried more about scripted Porcelains broken by a non-POSIX shell if I were you.
> Would it be acceptable to instead force the platform's shell option > (if it exists) to always use physical paths for the tests and drop the > "-P" flags?
As a patch to the source files in my tree? Not likely, even though I cannot say for sure without looking at how the change would look like.