Re: [PATCH] commit-tree: utilize parse-options api
- From
Brandon Richardson <brandon1024.br@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 28, 2019, 02:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAETBDP42djjmSXeLig6mcRJVR0YMPnDUfCJT4z8SU==Ei62N4w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20190227163522.GA25188@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Hi Jeff,
Show 12 quoted lines
> One of the reasons I did not bother with that condition when I added the > OPT_NEG() and OPT_ARG() variants is that you can only get an unexpected > NULL argument if you explicitly give the NOARG or OPTARG flags. So it's > very easy to _forget_ to give such a flag, because you simply aren't > thinking about that case, and your callback is buggy by default. > > But it's rare to actually think to give one of those flags, but then > forget to handle it in your callback. > > So I'm not entirely opposed, but it does feel weird to add such a macro > without then using it in the 99% of callbacks which expect arg to be > non-NULL.
I'd like to agree with you here, especially given that commit-tree is a rather small part of project source. Experimenting with it a bit, I found using BUG_ON_OPT_NOARG() to be a big clunky. Like you said, we could end up with some less-than-ideal usage. If I were to use this in commit-tree, it would look something like this, which isn't very appealing:
static int callback(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset)
{
...
BUG_ON_OPT_NEG(unset);
BUG_ON_OPT_NO_ARG(arg);
...However, I do still see a use case for a new macro for options that cannot be unset and arguments that must not be NULL.
> If we are going to go this route, I think you might actually want macros > that take both "unset" and "args" and make sure that we're not in a > situation the callback doesn't expect (e.g., "!unset && !arg"). That > lets us continue to declare those at the top of the callback.
In doing a quick search, I found a fair number instances of this: ... BUG_ON_OPT_NEG(unset);
if (!arg)
return -1;
...So a macro like this could be useful. I've also found a few instances of this:
BUG_ON_OPT_NEG(unset); BUG_ON_OPT_ARG(arg);
Perhaps two new macros BUG_ON_OPT_NEG_NO_ARG() ("!unset || !arg") and BUG_ON_OPT_NEG_ARG() ("!unset || arg")? I'm not a big fan of those names though.
Brandon