Re: [PATCH 1/2] sequencer: trivial fix
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 29, 2013, 13:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8Do-djwjVP1YvGnvsbdiWjE47KTK4pZZ3Qdnubvd-r3Lw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s0cpAkAUzo0nS55yv+6=cCBsBhgNiYxpEd8Hzk=3mfNhw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Felipe Contreras >> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote: >>> We should free objects before leaving. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> >> >> Micronit: perhaps you should move the "free obejcts before leaving" >> (in do_pick_commit) to the subject instead of "trivial fix", which >> adds no value to the patch. > > Perhaps. I prefer it this way because it's really a trivial fix not > really worth much time thinking about it. So when somebody is browsing > the history they can happily skip this one. The time save by not > reading I think adds more value than any succinct description that > would force each and every patch-reviewer/history-reader to read it.
Some time from now, assume a ridiculus case when this function grows more complex and somebody wonders what the "leave" label is for, "git log --oneline -Slabel:" showing "trivial fix" would not help much. -- Duy