Re: [PATCH 1/2] sequencer: trivial fix

> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Felipe Contreras
>>> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Felipe Contreras
>>>>> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> We should free objects before leaving.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Micronit: perhaps you should move the "free obejcts before leaving"
>>>>> (in do_pick_commit) to the subject instead of "trivial fix", which
>>>>> adds no value to the patch.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps. I prefer it this way because it's really a trivial fix not
>>>> really worth much time thinking about it. So when somebody is browsing
>>>> the history they can happily skip this one. The time save by not
>>>> reading I think adds more value than any succinct description that
>>>> would force each and every patch-reviewer/history-reader to read it.
>>>
>>> Some time from now, assume a ridiculus case when this function grows
>>> more complex and somebody wonders what the "leave" label is for, "git
>>> log --oneline -Slabel:" showing "trivial fix" would not help much.
>>
>> Fortunately that's not the main use-case, and for that single instance
>> that probably will never happen, I think it's not too much to ask to
>> this hypothetical developer to remove the --oneline, or copy-paste the
>> SHA-1 and take a peek. He would probably need to do that anyway.
>
> And the "time saving by not reading" is also hypothetical. But I won't
> continue this discussion.