Re: ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head?
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 13, 2013, 06:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8Dke6Pezqsdcjzejc_cWCgOGTGs8LifjM2h2TQJy7N4HA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CA+CP9O5fhyQrn3SboafocWJjaAywJHC0T-bw+AXk_8RX53hJ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:37 PM, David Jeske <davidj@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there currently any way to say "hey, git, show me what commits are > dangling that might be lost in the reflog?"
How do you define dangling commits? When you do "git commit --amend", the current commit will become dangling (in the sense that it's not referred by any ref, but the commit exists) and those are just noise in my opinion.
-- Duy