From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 06:05:52 GMT
Subject: Re: ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head?
Message-ID: <CACsJy8Dke6Pezqsdcjzejc_cWCgOGTGs8LifjM2h2TQJy7N4HA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+CP9O5fhyQrn3SboafocWJjaAywJHC0T-bw+AXk_8RX53hJ6Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:37 PM, David Jeske <davidj@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there currently any way to say "hey, git, show me what commits are
> dangling that might be lost in the reflog?"

How do you define dangling commits? When you do "git commit --amend",
the current commit will become dangling (in the sense that it's not
referred by any ref, but the commit exists) and those are just noise
in my opinion.
-- 
Duy