Re: ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head?
- From
David Jeske <davidj@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 12, 2013, 19:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+CP9O6KQ8vB1k0necmKx3daekmybx5k11sUw4n+b-9SygM5nQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vk3jqzush.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Don't we already do that? > > Warning: you are leaving N commits behind, not connected to > any of your branches: > > ... list of commits to be lost ...
This only shows on checkout... not reset, not submodule-update, nor any other ways you can clobber a detached head.