Re: [RFC 0/16] Introduce index file format version 5

From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 2, 2012, 12:10 UTC
Message-ID: <CACsJy8De=1RR9yAQ79zzNM_iALF1OCB2L9A8pMK_v+ixZqgJug@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1343905326-23790-1-git-send-email-t.gummerer@gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 13 quoted lines

> Documentation/technical/index-file-format-v5.txt |  281 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> builtin/update-index.c                           |    5 +-
> cache-tree.c                                     |  145 ++++++++++++++++++
> cache-tree.h                                     |    7 +
> cache.h                                          |   96 +++++++++++-
> read-cache.c                                     | 1519 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> resolve-undo.c                                   |  129 ++++++++++++++++
> resolve-undo.h                                   |    3 +
> t/perf/p0002-index.sh                            |   33 ++++
> t/t2104-update-index-skip-worktree.sh            |   15 +-
> t/t3700-add.sh                                   |    1 +
> test-index-version.c                             |    2 +-
> 12 files changed, 2082 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-)

This is not good (too many pluses in read-cache.c) if it comes from format-patch. Does it?

-- 
Duy