Re: [RFC 0/16] Introduce index file format version 5

From: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 2, 2012, 13:47 UTC
Message-ID: <20120802134718.GA1000@tgummerer.unibz.it>
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8De=1RR9yAQ79zzNM_iALF1OCB2L9A8pMK_v+ixZqgJug@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/02, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:

Show 17 quoted lines

> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Documentation/technical/index-file-format-v5.txt |  281 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > builtin/update-index.c                           |    5 +-
> > cache-tree.c                                     |  145 ++++++++++++++++++
> > cache-tree.h                                     |    7 +
> > cache.h                                          |   96 +++++++++++-
> > read-cache.c                                     | 1519 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > resolve-undo.c                                   |  129 ++++++++++++++++
> > resolve-undo.h                                   |    3 +
> > t/perf/p0002-index.sh                            |   33 ++++
> > t/t2104-update-index-skip-worktree.sh            |   15 +-
> > t/t3700-add.sh                                   |    1 +
> > test-index-version.c                             |    2 +-
> > 12 files changed, 2082 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-)
> 
> This is not good (too many pluses in read-cache.c) if it comes from
> format-patch. Does it?

No this comes from git diff --stat. It's probably just my terminal width then?