Re: [PATCH 2/2] repack -ad: prune the list of shallow commits
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 17, 2018, 16:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8Cxp6Gtt3YdWvQ0=t4vqBAqNxrGPeY4B7mtjsiLNpG5TQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8Ce0kXTCzLf6jFq1QjY4Q4QePfk1JbgGUr-kQqQDCc7mA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 6:39 PM Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 26 quoted lines
> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:19 PM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget > <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> > > > > While it is true that we never add unreachable commits into pack files > > intentionally (as `git repack`'s documentation states), we must not > > forget that a `git fetch --prune` (or even a `git fetch` when a ref was > > force-pushed in the meantime) can make a commit unreachable that was > > reachable before. > > > > Therefore it is not safe to assume that a `git repack -adlf` will keep > > unreachable commits alone (under the assumption that they had not been > > packed in the first place). > > > > This is particularly important to keep in mind when looking at the > > `.git/shallow` file: if any commits listed in that file become > > unreachable, it is not a problem, but if they go missing, it *is* a > > problem. One symptom of this problem is that a deepening fetch may now > > fail with > > > > fatal: error in object: unshallow <commit-hash> > > > > Could you elaborate a bit more?
Never mind. The problem is described in another patch.. sigh.. I understand you want to flip that "failure" to "success" but personally I don't think it worth it to look back in history and have "what?" moments like when I read this patch alone.
-- Duy