Re: [PATCH] run-command: simplify wait_or_whine
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 1, 2013, 14:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8BFv7kJkymJ_rj9dwaN-zMcHtS9sjmqDSpLWB5TsUU_kg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s0L1M+_s2eDM=Ogy=rxLhpZYwSb8qWTuEe30pB4KGDVtA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Felipe Contreras >> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, and last year we returned a different code. The world didn't > end, because nobody is checking for the specific code. But if you want > to retain complexity forever, suit yourselves.
And that was changed for a reason, compared to this change "because I like it". I maintain my NAK (not that it matters) until you justify your change better than "nobody is using it".
Show 5 quoted lines
> commit 709ca730f8e093005cc882bfb86c0ca9c83d345b > Author: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> > Date: Sat Jan 5 09:49:49 2013 -0500 > > run-command: encode signal death as a positive integer
-- Duy