Re: [PATCH v3] pull: handle --log=<n>
- From
Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 22, 2015, 13:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACRoPnSbAA=6xH+4W8KGPRWe8Pi304zz70Kz8TgY92qKtDYQ8A@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq1ti9ipy9.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
Hi Junio,
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com> writes: > >> So, here's the re-rolled patch. > > Sigh, too late. > > I thought the previous round was good enough and the patch is > already on 'next'. > > If the incremental change is still worth doing on top, please do so. > > Thanks.
My bad, I should have checked 'next'.
But it's okay, I re-rolled the patch because it seemed that people preferred "test_commit". I personally don't have a strong opinion on this, so if you're fine with it then I'm okay as well.
Thanks, Paul