From: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 13:29:55 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pull: handle --log=<n>
Message-ID: <CACRoPnSbAA=6xH+4W8KGPRWe8Pi304zz70Kz8TgY92qKtDYQ8A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq1ti9ipy9.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

Hi Junio,

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> So, here's the re-rolled patch.
>
> Sigh, too late.
>
> I thought the previous round was good enough and the patch is
> already on 'next'.
>
> If the incremental change is still worth doing on top, please do so.
>
> Thanks.

My bad, I should have checked 'next'.

But it's okay, I re-rolled the patch because it seemed that people
preferred "test_commit". I personally don't have a strong opinion on
this, so if you're fine with it then I'm okay as well.

Thanks,
Paul