Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] am: let --signoff override --no-signoff
- From
Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 12, 2015, 03:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACRoPnQufFJuK+JcdZprBRfaFczkMo0Q=ddp2M6=SiThXPDvTw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACRoPnSmeR9ETZ4M6GqkbtEZxM-_J-Dxgsx34ntPnojM1j0ZqQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's not present in this diff context, but this hunk modifies the code > path where in_progress is true. In other words, we only check for > SIGNOFF_EXPLICIT if
..we are resuming.
(Ugh, butter fingers)
Thanks, Paul