From: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:07:20 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] am: let --signoff override --no-signoff
Message-ID: <CACRoPnQufFJuK+JcdZprBRfaFczkMo0Q=ddp2M6=SiThXPDvTw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACRoPnSmeR9ETZ4M6GqkbtEZxM-_J-Dxgsx34ntPnojM1j0ZqQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's not present in this diff context, but this hunk modifies the code
> path where in_progress is true. In other words, we only check for
> SIGNOFF_EXPLICIT if

..we are resuming.

(Ugh, butter fingers)

Thanks,
Paul