Re: "git am" and then "git am -3" regression?
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Jul 27, 2015, 08:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqmvyiauns.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <20150726052100.GA31790@peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Yeah, having to worry about two implementations of "git am" is a real > pain. If we are close on merging the builtin version, it makes sense to > me to hold off on the am.threeway feature until that is merged. Trying > to fix the ordering of the script that is going away isn't a good use of > anybody's time.
So, the best option seems to be:
1) Revert d96a275 (git-am: add am.threeWay config variable, 2015-06-04)
2) Include the C port of d96a275 together with tests and docs verbatim from d96a275 into Paul's series.
Actually, doing 1) is probably a good idea anyway, there's no reason to hold the release for such minor feature.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/