Re: [PATCH v2 23/33] diff-merges: fix style of functions definitions
- From
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 18, 2020, 05:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CABPp-BEf2nbahjzR6aLLNy0YsHYcHqCozCe6veoZOH3LAM892g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20201216184929.3924-24-sorganov@gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:50 AM Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 117 quoted lines
>
> Put open curly brace on its own line
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
> ---
> diff-merges.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/diff-merges.c b/diff-merges.c
> index cba391604ac7..0165fa22fcd1 100644
> --- a/diff-merges.c
> +++ b/diff-merges.c
> @@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
>
> #include "revision.h"
>
> -static void suppress(struct rev_info *revs) {
> +static void suppress(struct rev_info *revs)
> +{
> revs->separate_merges = 0;
> revs->first_parent_merges = 0;
> revs->combine_merges = 0;
> @@ -10,17 +11,20 @@ static void suppress(struct rev_info *revs) {
> revs->combined_all_paths = 0;
> }
>
> -static void set_separate(struct rev_info *revs) {
> +static void set_separate(struct rev_info *revs)
> +{
> suppress(revs);
> revs->separate_merges = 1;
> }
>
> -static void set_first_parent(struct rev_info *revs) {
> +static void set_first_parent(struct rev_info *revs)
> +{
> set_separate(revs);
> revs->first_parent_merges = 1;
> }
>
> -static void set_m(struct rev_info *revs) {
> +static void set_m(struct rev_info *revs)
> +{
> /*
> * To "diff-index", "-m" means "match missing", and to the "log"
> * family of commands, it means "show full diff for merges". Set
> @@ -30,19 +34,22 @@ static void set_m(struct rev_info *revs) {
> revs->match_missing = 1;
> }
>
> -static void set_combined(struct rev_info *revs) {
> +static void set_combined(struct rev_info *revs)
> +{
> suppress(revs);
> revs->combine_merges = 1;
> revs->dense_combined_merges = 0;
> }
>
> -static void set_dense_combined(struct rev_info *revs) {
> +static void set_dense_combined(struct rev_info *revs)
> +{
> suppress(revs);
> revs->combine_merges = 1;
> revs->dense_combined_merges = 1;
> }
>
> -static void set_diff_merges(struct rev_info *revs, const char *optarg) {
> +static void set_diff_merges(struct rev_info *revs, const char *optarg)
> +{
> if (0) ;
> else if (!strcmp(optarg, "off") || !strcmp(optarg, "none"))
> suppress(revs);
> @@ -62,7 +69,8 @@ static void set_diff_merges(struct rev_info *revs, const char *optarg) {
> * Public functions. They are in the order they are called.
> */
>
> -int diff_merges_parse_opts(struct rev_info *revs, const char **argv) {
> +int diff_merges_parse_opts(struct rev_info *revs, const char **argv)
> +{
> int argcount = 1;
> const char *optarg;
> const char *arg = argv[0];
> @@ -86,23 +94,27 @@ int diff_merges_parse_opts(struct rev_info *revs, const char **argv) {
> return argcount;
> }
>
> -void diff_merges_suppress(struct rev_info *revs) {
> +void diff_merges_suppress(struct rev_info *revs)
> +{
> suppress(revs);
> }
>
> -void diff_merges_default_to_first_parent(struct rev_info *revs) {
> +void diff_merges_default_to_first_parent(struct rev_info *revs)
> +{
> if (!revs->explicit_diff_merges)
> revs->separate_merges = 1;
> if (revs->separate_merges)
> revs->first_parent_merges = 1;
> }
>
> -void diff_merges_default_to_dense_combined(struct rev_info *revs) {
> +void diff_merges_default_to_dense_combined(struct rev_info *revs)
> +{
> if (!revs->explicit_diff_merges)
> set_dense_combined(revs);
> }
>
> -void diff_merges_set_dense_combined_if_unset(struct rev_info *revs) {
> +void diff_merges_set_dense_combined_if_unset(struct rev_info *revs)
> +{
> if (!revs->combine_merges)
> set_dense_combined(revs);
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
>But...didn't you add all these functions yourself earlier in the series? Why didn't you split this patch up and squash it into the relevant previous patches?