Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix failing t4301 test and &&-chain breakage

>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:53 PM Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 1:05 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> > > >   t4301: account for behavior differences between sed implementations
> > > >   t4031: fix broken &&-chains and add missing loop termination
> > > >   t4301: emit blank line in more idiomatic fashion
> > >
> > > The second one is off by 270.
> >
> > Apparently Eric knew what you meant, but I'm perplexed by this
> > statement and what it means.  What am I missing?
>
> Junio's comment was opaque to me, as well, and it took several minutes
> to figure it out (especially since I authored the patches, thus I read
> what I expected to read, not what was really there). Taking a look at
> just prefixes on the patch subject lines...
>
>     t4301
>     t4031
>     t4301
>
> there's a transposition in there which, mathematically speaking, makes
> one of the test script numbers 270 less than the others.