Re: [PATCH 0/4] sequencer: clarify translations

From: Michael J Gruber <git@grubix.eu>
Date: Aug 19, 2022, 10:19 UTC
Message-ID: <CAA19uiQhgxKDM8LJq-os=KuxmwVOt2eJ_pkpj0eLBU=E0MYLRQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2p150404-o6r0-4p10-o0s4-orso00o6n369@tzk.qr>

Am Fr., 19. Aug. 2022 um 11:32 Uhr schrieb Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>:

Show 13 quoted lines

>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2022, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> > thanks for all your input to my RFC patch. I tried to summarize and pack
> > everything up into this little series.
> >
> > A follow-up could (but does not have to) turn translated action names
> > into untranslated git command names in some places.
>
> Thank you for persisting on this, and on behalf of the core Git reviewers
> I would like to apologize for the hornets' nest.

No need to. After all, this thoroughness is a huge part of what makes git into what it is.

It's also why I'ven been participating much less: simply for lack of time. That thoroughness takes time, sometimes much more than expected (and can be frustrating, even in the very technical-physical meaning). But discussions here are always about the best solution (not "whose" solution "wins"), and that is why I'm always happy to be back for a bit.

> I offer my ACK to this iteration of the patch series, with or without the
> v2 of patch 4/4.

Thanks!

Personally, I care only about the consistent reflog, which currently means untranslated. Not that I look at the reflog all the time, but ...

Michael