Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]
- From
Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 19, 2016, 23:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+P7+xp-CupfFwQv+U-KNh4bxG9Mxkbfip5RJebKX9gjffoOsw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160919234022.GA29421@cloud>
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:34:35PM -0700, Jeff King wrote: >> As far as your patch goes, I'd be OK with defining: >> >> --rfc:: >> Pretend as if `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'` was given. >>
Would:
Shorthand for `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'`
be a better reading? I feel like using "pretend" is a bit weird here.
That being said, I'm not super strongly against it, but just find that it sounds weird for documentation.
Thanks, Jake