From: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 23:46:06 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]
Message-ID: <CA+P7+xp-CupfFwQv+U-KNh4bxG9Mxkbfip5RJebKX9gjffoOsw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160919234022.GA29421@cloud>

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:34:35PM -0700, Jeff King wrote:
>> As far as your patch goes, I'd be OK with defining:
>>
>>   --rfc::
>>       Pretend as if `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'` was given.
>>

Would:

Shorthand for `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'`

be a better reading? I feel like using "pretend" is a bit weird here.

That being said, I'm not super strongly against it, but just find that
it sounds weird for documentation.

Thanks,
Jake