Re: [PATCH 2/2] xdiff: implement empty line chunk heuristic
- From
Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 3, 2016, 17:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+P7+xp=8hTgLkmsUFW2d6VF82hEdYxGa48N5HLY-gj1H3WJzQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160502180231.GA8812@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 24 quoted lines
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 10:40:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> writes: >> >> > True. I think the chances that it needs such a thing are quite minor, >> > and if an undocumented knob gets exposed it would have to become >> > documented and maintained, so I'd prefer to avoid it. Given that the >> > risk is pretty small I think that's ok. >> >> OK, then let's do only the "documentation" part. >> >> -- >8 -- >> Subject: [PATCH] diff: undocument the compaction heuristic knobs for experimentation >> >> It seems that people around here are all happy with the updated >> heuristics used to decide where the hunks are separated. Let's keep >> that as the default. Even though we do not expect too much trouble >> from the difference between the old and the new algorithms, just in >> case let's leave the implementation of the knobs to turn it off for >> emergencies. There is no longer need for documenting them, though. > > I agree with this reasoning. Thanks. > > -Peff
I think I agree too.
Thanks, Jake