Re: [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules
- From
Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 13, 2017, 19:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+P7+xp=1PUsq1_or=J8ED+-1NMaF=BckC9bK4jqWbA+RFeszw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGZ79kZ8KV+c2StKR8tp=s_E1+uEaSezgsmUfyyO9HUrmzdT+g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> wrote: >> Add in a check to see if a submodule is active before attempting to >> recurse. This prevents 'ls-files' from trying to operate on a submodule >> which may not exist in the working directory. > > What would currently happen on recursing into non-active submodules? > Can we have a test for this? > > Thanks, > Stefan
We should be able to test for this. Is it possible that we can recurse into a submodule as long as we have the clone in .git/modules/<name> even if we don't have it checked out currently?
Thanks, Jake