From: David Jeske <davidj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 19:40:39 GMT
Subject: Re: ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head?
Message-ID: <CA+CP9O6KQ8vB1k0necmKx3daekmybx5k11sUw4n+b-9SygM5nQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vk3jqzush.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Don't we already do that?
>
>     Warning: you are leaving N commits behind, not connected to
>     any of your branches:
>
>         ... list of commits to be lost ...

This only shows on checkout... not reset, not submodule-update, nor
any other ways you can clobber a detached head.