Re: [git patches] libata updates, GPG signed (but see admin notes)
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Nov 6, 2011, 00:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+55aFzxmDC407EDcm8MV55R7BnRhuxuTOyhZ-jyg2q39=NKfw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vsjm2870k.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Junio C Hamano <junio@pobox.com> wrote:
> > You do not have to resort to NUL; we could just stuff whatever you do not > need to see but needs to be left *intact* in the new header fields just > like the embedded GPG signatures are stored in signed commits.
Agreed, [ details removed ] that sounds perfect. And makes it easy to get at if you want to with just "git cat-file commit" - without ever really being visible to people who don't care. And having it visible in the editor with '#' means that the user who does the merge gets to see what actually ended up being put in there, along with the fact that yes, it verified correctly.
So I think I really like that approach - it seems to solve all problems.
Linus