Re: [git patches] libata updates, GPG signed (but see admin notes)
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Nov 3, 2011, 02:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+55aFzbNxTn83DdQd9cVpDujNYEdEP0Aimv5k1hCD0ebTDzcQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAJo=hJsXvSyB65KBp8sfciT=h5uZSqSUdxkpWtZJRtr4hXAh5A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
> > <rant>
I'm answering this separately, because it's a separate rant.
It's also totally bogus, but whatever.
> Get over it. Add the fucking empty commit to show the flow of a > change. Stop forcing every fucking contributor to rebase/rewrite his > commits just so someone higher up in the food chain can wank with > their SOB line.
Shawn, stop using whatever drugs you are using.
NOBODY EVER REBASES ANYTHING FOR SIGNED-OFF-BY.
If they do, they are doing things very very wrong.
Signed-off-by: is *purely* for sending patches by email. No git operations involved. None. Nada. Zilch. No rebasing involved, because there's not even a git repository involved, for chissake!
Once something is in git, it's not signed off on - there should be a sign-off-chain from the author to the committer, and that's it. Anything else would be crazy.
So stop the crazy rants. Stop with the bad drugs. Seriously. You're acting crazy.
Linus