Re: [git patches] libata updates, GPG signed (but see admin notes)
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Nov 3, 2011, 19:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+55aFyRawm9CoJMiEXDFCX4YTidPOiV4oqSS2d7nNv7Ecw8BQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vvcr1f38j.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> > Ahh, sorry for the noise. I realize that we already have a winner, namely, > the proposal outlined in your message I was responding to.
No, no, don't consider my "put in the merge message" a winner at all.
I personally dislike it, and don't really think it's a wonderful thing at all. I really does have real downsides:
- internal signatures really *are* a disaster for maintenance. You can never fix them if they need fixing (and "need fixing" may well be "you want to re-sign things after a repository format change")
- they are ugly as heck, and you really don't want to see them in 99.999% of all cases.
So putting those things iin the merge commit message may have some upsides, but it has tons of downsides too.
I think your refs/audit/ idea should be given real thought, because maybe that's the right idea.
Linus