Re: [RFC/largely untested/PATCH] sha1_name: interpret ~n as HEAD~n
- From
- Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 7, 2011, 02:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <BANLkTinsWpXYN+Zejph6toidZWFAkprcYw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <BANLkTi=7_-TF63Y9MRHZ_XirSUD6RAC9kw@mail.gmail.com>
On 30 April 2011 01:23, Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Heya, > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 00:34, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote: >> So there really isn't a lot of consistency, I guess. It also conflicts >> a little with the shell's "~user" syntax, though presumably you don't >> have users named "1" and "2". > > FWIW, I like the patch, mainly because I dislike typing HEAD~n (I > usually mispel it as HEA~n) and agree with peff's analysis, we're such > a long way from being any form of consistent that I don't see this > breaking any user expectations.
Something I always set up in the skeleton dir ($prefix/share/git-core/templates) after installing git is echo 'ref: HEAD' > h it makes life so much easier :).
-- Mikael Magnusson