Re: [RFC/largely untested/PATCH] sha1_name: interpret ~n as HEAD~n
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 29, 2011, 23:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <BANLkTi=7_-TF63Y9MRHZ_XirSUD6RAC9kw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110429223433.GA3434@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Heya,
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 00:34, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> So there really isn't a lot of consistency, I guess. It also conflicts > a little with the shell's "~user" syntax, though presumably you don't > have users named "1" and "2".
FWIW, I like the patch, mainly because I dislike typing HEAD~n (I usually mispel it as HEA~n) and agree with peff's analysis, we're such a long way from being any form of consistent that I don't see this breaking any user expectations.
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier